|
|
|
Mega Genius® Intelligence Briefing:
The Seven Basic Rules of Communication Abraham
Lincoln, the sixteenth President of the We
know from the Encyclopedia Britannica
that Walter Matthau, the son of Jewish-Russian immigrants, was born Walter John
Matuschanskayasky, in 1920, in Lying
is the act of alleging that something that happened, did not, or that something
that did not happen, did. Walter
continually enjoyed doing both, preferably simultaneously.
For a couple of decades, he was the least truthful, and one of the most
enjoyable, of my friends. If you
were not fortunate enough to know Walter Matthau, allow me to introduce you to
him. Walter
loved to lie to, and entertain, the largest audience possible.
For instance, in 1967, he was injured in an automobile accident.
Shortly thereafter, he won an Academy Award, ®
for “Best Actor in a Supporting Role” in the motion picture The
Fortune Cookie. As Walter
accepted his Oscar ®
at the most prominent and most watched film awards ceremony in the world, it was
obvious that he had been badly banged up in some sort of calamity, which he
“divulged” to the audience was the result of having fallen from his bicycle.
Then he scolded several other major award winners, including Elizabeth
Taylor, for not showing up. After
all, he had cared enough to drag his dreadful carcass there. No
one was immune. He even lied to the
United States Social Security Administration, which manages the country’s
social insurance program. (I’m
sensing a felony here.) In 1937,
when Walter registered for a social security number, he
convinced that agency of the Time
after time, I heard Walter tell outlandish tales, for the most insignificant
reasons, just for fun and to see who was gullible.
For example, he lied about his wife, actress Carol Marcus, claiming that
her middle name was “Wellington-Smythe,” just because it sounded
aristocratic. Incidentally, he also
told me, “I never mind my wife having the last word.
In fact, I’m delighted when she gets to it.” No
one knows all of Walter Matthau’s lies. However,
I know that he told an interviewer that his grandfather, who was really a poor
peddler, from At
6:00:55 a.m., on Tuesday, 9 February 1971, one of the most devastating
earthquakes in Shortly
thereafter, on The Tonight Show,
Walter told Johnny Carson that in January of that year he had developed severe
constipation. None of the normal
remedies had worked. Walter was
desperate. Finally, in early
February, his physician had prescribed a potent surefire laxative, but had
warned him that he should take only two of the small pink pills, at bedtime, and
then prepare for a thoroughly satisfactory result immediately upon arising the
next morning. Weary of his
predicament, though, Walter had doubled the dosage before turning in for the
evening. About
45 minutes before sunrise, his alarm had awakened him at exactly 6:00 a.m., on
Tuesday, 9 February. Then he had
immediately gone to the bathroom, where he had taken a seat, selected a
magazine, and trusted in the wonders of modern medicine. Literally
within seconds, his stomach felt unsettled, and he noticed a muffled rumbling,
which quickly amplified. Snapping
and cracking sounds reverberated within his legs and throughout the bathroom, a
painting fell from the wall behind him, and toiletries pitched and ricocheted
about the room. Then he tossed the
unopened magazine to the floor and grasped the toilet seat firmly, with both
hands. Suddenly, he shook from side
to side and then began violently bouncing up and down on the commode, which he
held on to with all his might, just to keep from being launched from it, as he
hollered to his wife, “Holy crap!” These
pills are miraculous!” Walter
milked the story on the Repeatedly,
Walter vowed to the millions of television viewers that he was not exaggerating
and that the story was 100 percent true. Moreover,
he never publicly retracted a word of it. However,
the next time that Walter and I were alone, in Now,
the philosophical question that Walter has led us to confront is this:
Is it always bad to tell a lie? The
most intelligent answer is: No, it
depends on the effect produced. For
example, no meaningful harm is done by inducing a small child to set out cookies
and milk for Santa Claus; or, by fibbing to a teenager, to surprise him with a
birthday party; or, by a magician boldly lying to an adult in order to fool him
with a magic trick. Those are all
examples of misleading a person for his own enjoyment and entertainment.
No harm is done. Neither was
it unethical for Walter Matthau to spin outlandish gags, just to amuse himself
and those sharp enough to get his jokes. Lies
are not necessarily unethical, although, whenever one tells a lie, he must be
careful not to cause an effect that the recipient would not want to receive.
Once you decide to tell a lie, a good rule of thumb is to ask yourself
this: Am I willing to admit the truth to a third party, selected at random?
If not, you should reconsider your intention. Insincerity
in communication is a matter of ethics, but does not necessarily violate the
basic rules of communication. Whether
a letter that is sent from you to another person is truthful or not, the rules
that govern the delivery of the envelope are the same.
Similarly, the basic rules of communication do not change. They
are extremely important rules to understand and apply at all times.
I did not concoct them; they are seven fundamental rules extrapolated
from the axioms on which the physical universe is based.
If you want your life to be a complex affair, just disregard them.
Conversely, if you want to straighten out your life, learn the seven
basic rules of communication well, and apply them consistently. First,
we need to define the subject, properly. Communication
is the act of sending something from one location to another and ensuring that
what is received is precisely what was sent. These
are the seven basic rules of communication: 1. Be able to communicate. If you are not in a location from which you can give and receive communication, and if you are not in a form in which you can do so, then you will not be able to communicate effectively, and you will have problems. For example, if you are isolated in a hospital’s intensive care unit, in a full-body cast, you will have difficulty communicating, and you will feel alone and frustrated. That is why babies who have not yet learned to talk feel upset and cry, and it is even why people who are deficient in their education think that life is unfair. Being able to communicate effectively is your responsibility. 2. Be willing to communicate. If you are not willing to give and receive communication, then it will not occur effectively. The person who says, “I refuse to talk about it,” might as well add, “And, thereby, I know that I am not contributing to a resolution of the situation, and I am probably making it worse.” 3. Communicate only if you are willing. Do not allow yourself to be forced to give or receive communication that you do not desire. If you do, you will not feel responsible for what ensues.
4. Communicate in an original manner. Do not make it appear as if you have already communicated the same thing so many times that you are playing a recording. Just as people tend to disregard form letters, they also ignore verbal communication that sounds as if it is being delivered automatically. 5. Get your questions answered. I recently watched a presidential debate in which the candidates answered less than five percent of the moderator’s questions. Instead, they pushed their agendas, sound bites and buzzwords. However, unless you repeat your unanswered question until you get an answer, you are contributing to miscommunication and a lack of understanding. 6. Acknowledge constructive (or positive) communication. Whenever someone communicates something to you, and you do not let him know that you received and understood what he sent, he will probably assume that, if you received it, you may not have understood it. Subsequently, since people who cannot understand are considered stupid, he is likely to consider that you are lacking in intelligence. In addition, if you nod your head, or say, “Yes,” or otherwise acknowledge someone before he has finished communicating something to you, he will know that you could not possibly have understood his statement, since he has not yet finished stating it to you. Furthermore, we already know what your inability to understand will lead him to conclude about you. 7. Ignore destructive (or negative) communication. Whenever
someone snipes at you, or tries to insult you, or otherwise attacks you, either
verbally or in writing, it is best to ignore it.
Do not acknowledge the existence of such a comment.
It is not a constructive communication, and any recognition of its existence is only likely to lead to an
argument. Those
seven basic rules of communication work only if you use them, consistently.
I sincerely hope that you do. Incidentally,
according to Walter Matthau’s obituary in The
New York Times, and his biography in the current edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, the famous actor who was born Walter John
Matuschanskayasky, in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, passed away 1 July 2000,
in Santa Monica, California, at the age of 79 (although he still lives in my
heart). However, if you believed for
a moment that his original surname really was “Matuschanskayasky,” then,
with a chuckle and a wink from his grave, the Academy Award-winning actor Walter
Matthau has fooled not only The New York
Times and the Encyclopedia Britannica
… but you, too. Mega
Genius 11 May 2007 NOTICE - Although these "Mega Genius® Intelligence Briefings" originate from beyond the top of the IQ scale, they are not substitutes for "The Mega Genius® Lectures" -- "The Genius Formula™ Series," " The Uncommon Sense Series," and "The Whole Truth Series," -- which are the fundamentals of wisdom. To learn how to skyrocket your intelligence in three easy steps with "The Genius Formula™ Series" of six lectures, in mp3 downloadable format, just select the glowing treasure chest below.
Copyright © 200 7 - 2008 - Mega Genius®. All rights reserved.
|